October was the month for hits and misses-some books were
fabulous and some books were absolutely awful!
Graceling was the book my feminist book club picked out
for October and it was fabulous! It’s
the first book of a trilogy and I will definitely read the other two. I so enjoyed watching the tale unfold that I
will actually try not to spoil the story too much for you. It is the story of Katsa who was born with
the grace, which is like a special talent, for killing and fighting. She meets the prince Po, who become friends
and together leave to save his cousin Bitterblue from the clutches of King
Leck. The book is a feminist allegory,
which makes it a delight to read, in my opinion. My book club thought King Randa represents
the patriarchy in the way that he controls Katsa in the beginning of the book
and I think they’re right, but I also think King Leck could also represent the patriarchy,
but I won’t say why, because that would spoil too much of the book. (Look at that, me being all nice!) I fell in love with the book on page 79 when
Po and Katsa fight together-they are both graced in fighting and so they fight as equals. I wrote down in my notes that it was,
“satisfying and refreshing” and that was how I felt reading the whole
book. It was refreshing to see a
relationship between a man and a woman where they viewed each other as
equals. It was refreshing and satisfying
for the male to be the one in the sensitive, more emotional role and the female
to be more impulsive. Po, the male, was
the one who appreciated beauty. I
thought the book was very effective in teaching feminist lessons to teens, much
more effective than probably a scholarly lecture ever would be. Probably the most effective lesson taught was
that every woman should know self-defense and it really would have been
appropriate for my book club to have ended the night by looking up a
self-defense class. In fact, as I write
that, I realize that that is still not bad idea. It is a sad fact that we live in an extremely
dangerous world and one way to not let the patriarchy have power over us is to
feel more confident about our ability to defend ourselves. I’ve felt a little intimidated about signing
up for a self-defense class before but after reading Graceling I realized that that
is a very foolish way to live and I just might sign up for the next class that
comes along and that, my friends, is how you write an effective feminist
book! Towards the end, the book even
brings up the point that one can have a disability and still be a whole person,
which is incredibly progressive and lovely.
I cried a little when I finished the book, which was only unfortunate,
because I was at Starbucks.
Mindful Eating: A Guide for Rediscovering A Healthy andJoyful Relationship with Food by Jan Chozen Bays
This one was a complete miss! DO NOT buy it or even borrow it from the
library! My nutritionist recommended
that I read some books on the subject of mindful eating and she said that any
book that was on a certain website would probably be good. I picked this book out, because it was
available at the library, but apparently that was not a good enough reason. Mindful eating is a practice that I believe
in, but like all practices there are those practitioners who err on all or
nothing thinking. Jan Chozen Bays is one
of those people and my nutritionist and I agreed that she seems fanatical and
extreme. The first time I tried to read
the book it majorly triggered me and brought out my perfectionist tendencies. Fortunately, the second time I started to
read it I realized that the problem was hers and not mine. I say that because while in mindful eating a
person is supposed to ask themselves how hungry they are before and after they
eat, Bays wants a person to ask themselves how hungry they are in seven different ways before they
eat! That is ridiculous! That is perfectionistic! And for someone who claims that they are
going to have a person rediscover a healthy and joyful relationship with
food-what she is suggesting seems awfully obsessive and eating disorder-y and I
cannot support that. I expressed my
concerns to my nutritionist and was quite relieved that she agreed with me and
even apologized she had somewhat encouraged me to read that book. There was only one point she made that I
liked and that she replaces the stigmatizing term “emotional eating” with “heart
hunger” and says that it is okay in moderation-that while we cannot eat enough
to fill the hole inside if what we are yearning for is really comfort, love,
affection, or touch, but we should take care to listen to our hearts and what
it is really hungry for-does it long for a food that reminds you of home? Then mindfully eat it. Does it need a hug? Then hug a friend or stuffed animal. (By the way, I got most of this from the blog,
A Weight Lifted – I still
wouldn’t read the book.)
I only very, very cautiously recommend this book. I found this book also on the mindful eating
website and yes, the book is on mindful eating, but it was not the type of book
that my nutritionist wanted me to read about, but about being conscious of
where your food comes from and whether it was treated/raised ethically or
not. Once I realized that I was a little
annoyed, but it was a subject that I was already interested in, so I continued
reading. I found Jane Goodall to be
presumptuous and classist and arrogant, which sadly, did not surprise me too
much. It did make me very sad though,
because I have always been fascinated by her work with animals. She made great points and I recommend it,
because it really did convince me to change some of my habits. I only cautiously recommend it though,
because the graphic explanations about the violence towards animals could be
triggering to people and her classist attitude may be more than some are
willing to read. For instance, she is
vegetarian and even though she would repeatedly talk about ethical ways to eat
meat, she almost always would follow it up with some form of comment about how
it would still be better to be vegetarian. There were subtle and some not-so-subtle
classist digs all over the book. I
nearly threw the book down in disgust when she showed a picture of a nameless
fat boy eating a big sandwich over the words similar to, “the obesity crisis is
happening to our children.” The nerve,
she didn’t even let the kid keep his own name, but took away his agency and
turned him into a symbolic fat child. I
think that is incredibly, incredibly disgusting and dehumanizing behavior. So yes, read it to learn about where your
food comes from and then write a letter to Jane Goodall expressing what was so
problematic with her book from a humanistic standpoint. (Please let me be clear-I still enormously admire Jane Goodall, I just think she is out of touch with the common person and especially with the problems of poor people.)
I love good children’s books and am in the process of
reading all the books I should have read as a child. My mom says that I did read the book and that
I didn’t like it then, but I don’t remember that at all. I find it hard to believe, considering that I
do remember that I liked the 1988 movie. I
found the book fascinating, especially since the book was written in the 1940s. Pippi is
great! Okay, so sometimes she seems a
little bratty to my adult sensibilities, but overall she’s fabulous. I love that she has superhuman strength,
stands up to bullies, and thinks outside the box. There’s no princess-girlie crap, but a strong
girl descended from pirates who can take care of herself, which makes her
appeal to both boys and girls and a strong role model. Pippi is very sure of herself, which is very
nice in this age where I feel like girls are constantly pressured to please
everyone else and so do not have the foundations for strong and stable self-
images. I also liked that there were
several passages where the children (Pippi spends a lot of time with her two
next-door-neighbors) are so full from eating that they lie down, satisfied in
being stuffed. There can hardly be any
better measure of perfect childhood than that!
It’s not that we shouldn’t teach our children about mindful eating and
listening to our bodies, but I think in our anxious, body-conscious culture we
often go too far. Most little girls are
not happy with their bodies. From the
National Eating Disorders Association website, “81% of 10 year olds are afraid
of being fat” and that was way back in 1991-unfortunately, I’m sure it’s gotten
worse. That is why the thin-girlie-princess
motif needs to go and the strong girls like Pippi need to come back-and why the
fat acceptance movement is so important!
Fat ain’t something to fear, it’s a part of our body and I shouldn’t
have had to find that out in an inpatient unit, sick with ED-NOS. Also, I hope you followed the author's link-it turns out that in her later life, she became an awesome activist speaking out on issues related to economics, ethical treatment of animals, and against corporal punishment for children. Speaking out for others is another lesson that our children should learn.
Link Love:
RD Magazine-"Flipping the Script" to Win Gays Back to the Evangelical Church
If God declares that it is not good for the human being to be alone, if God says we should have a partner who fulfils us, then surely condemning gay people to lives of singleness and celibacy opposes divine will. (Amy-Jill Levine)
What do you have to say to naysayers out there
who say things like "Stop being so sensitive!" and "It's just a
word!"
A Great Picture of Astrid Lindgren
Link Love:
RD Magazine-"Flipping the Script" to Win Gays Back to the Evangelical Church
If God declares that it is not good for the human being to be alone, if God says we should have a partner who fulfils us, then surely condemning gay people to lives of singleness and celibacy opposes divine will. (Amy-Jill Levine)
I have no interest in addressing them. My energy
is limited—I am raising a kid, I have a job, I write, I have a life. My energy
is for moving the conversation forward with whoever I think can help me. The
reality—the word is a reflection of how we view "these people." That
is true whether someone means that when they use the word or not.This sounds
very grand but my goal is to help change the world in favor of people like my
son. I cannot be pulled down by people who want to plant their flag on saving a
hateful word.
This is a pivotal time in LGBT
history, one in which transgender people need our support. The outdated bigotry
we see on TV, particularly on some of CBS’ comedies, gets in the way of
progress for everyone.
Why does tagging someone as “probably queer” automatically
mean that if they’re dating someone of the opposite gender, they’re deceiving
themselves or flat-out lying?
I can remember being in Oklahoma amongst a lot of
different tribal people when I was in junior college and Thanksgiving
was coming around and I
couldn’t come home—it was too far and too expensive—and people were talking
about, Thanksgiving, and, yeah, the Indians! And I said, yeah, we’re the
Wampanoags. They didn’t know! We’re not even taught what kind of Indians,
Hopefully, in the future, at least for Americans, we do need to get a lot
brighter about other people.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment